MDARD Launches Good Food for Michigan Project

MDARD Launches Good Food for Michigan Project

bob new header
For immediate release: Dec. 11, 2025

Media contact: Lynsey Mukomel, 517-290-1734

 

MDARD Launches Good Food for Michigan Project

New initiative cultivates opportunities for farmers to feed their communities, institutions to source Michigan-grown food

 

LANSING, Mich. – The Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) today announced the Good Food for Michigan project, which will focus on keeping locally grown food in Michigan communities.

“The Good Food for Michigan project will strengthen regional food systems by equipping community colleges, schools, hospitals and other institutions across the state with tools they need to access nutritious, locally grown and prepared foods,” said MDARD Director Tim Boring. “By helping institutions purchase Michigan-grown foods, we can create new opportunities for farmers to sell locally, improve families’ access to nourishing foods and build healthier, more resilient economies and communities.”

Good Food for Michigan is a product of Director Boring’s conversations with growers and community groups around the state who have expressed concerns about the strain federal policies are putting on food access and affordability, as well as with those who voiced a desire for more opportunities to feed their communities with local foods.

The Center for Good Food Purchasing – a national leader in transforming how public institutions purchase food – is MDARD’s partner in the project.

“Michigan has shown what’s possible when communities, institutions, and producers move in the same direction,” said Alexa Delwiche, Executive Director at the Center for Good Food Purchasing. “This partnership lets us apply the Center’s proven model and approach—clear standards, hands-on technical assistance, cross-sector stakeholder engagement and rigorous measurement and verification—to deepen relationships across the state, strengthen local supply chains and help more schools, hospitals and public agencies buy nourishing Michigan-grown Good Food. Together, we’ll expand new market opportunities for growers, align public dollars with community values and build on Michigan’s role as a learning and innovation hub for Good Food Purchasing.”

Among other actions, MDARD’s Good Food for Michigan project will prioritize local food supplies by assisting partner community institutions with:

  • Assessing their food procurement practices
  • Meeting good food purchasing targets
  • Creating supplier/vendor diversification plans that include local and regional food sources
  • Developing and implementing comprehensive institutional policies that reflect community needs and values as they relate to food

Increased consumption of locally grown foods can improve individual and community health outcomes while supporting local farmers and reducing the environmental costs of food production and transportation.

Additionally, the project will utilize a proven model that equips schools and other institutions with the tools and technical support they need to source and procure locally grown foods. The Good Food Purchasing Program model emphasizes:

  • Strengthening local and community-based economies
  • Improving community health
  • Supporting a valued workforce
  • Promoting environmental sustainability
  • Ensuring accountability, equity and transparency in food systems.

The Good Food for Michigan project will complement other innovative MDARD programs focused on strengthening regional food systems across the state. In its first year, MDARD’s Farm to Family Program has awarded more than $730,000 to support food hubs and farm stops that give Michigan producers and consumers more opportunities to sell and buy locally grown foods. So far, work completed with support from grant funding has resulted in moving nearly 85,000 pounds of local produce and meat and serving nearly 1,400 Michigan families.

Visit MDARD’s website for more information about efforts to improve Michigan families’ access to nutritious, locally grown foods.

AG Nessel Warns Michigan Veterans of Postcard Scam

AG Nessel Warns Michigan Veterans of Postcard Scam

Michigan Department of Attorney General Press Release banner

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 4, 2025

Media Contact:
Danny Wimmer

AG Nessel Warns Michigan Veterans of Postcard Scam Targeting Personal Information

LANSING – Today, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel is warning veterans about a scam after reports that Michigan veterans have received fraudulent postcards claiming they are eligible for additional benefits. The scam involves fraudsters using a postcard that seems legitimate to have veterans call a phone number to receive benefits or rewards, only to steal their information.

Residents can protect themselves by being cautious when receiving such offers. Attorney General Nessel urges residents to verify the legitimacy of postcards regarding veteran resources before providing any personal information – such as a Social Security number, veteran ID number, or bank details – by reaching out to their veteran service officer, their county veterans affairs office or by calling the Michigan Veterans Affairs Agency’s (MVAA) Michigan Veterans Resource Service Center at 800-MICH-VET (800-642-4838).

“Fraudsters are always looking for ways to steal your personal information,” Nessel said. “If veterans receive a postcard in the mail, they should trust their instincts, remain cautious, and verify any claims with their veteran service officer or the MVAA to avoid falling victim to scammers.”

“Michigan is home to more than 486,000 veterans and their families,” said Michigan Veterans Affairs Agency (MVAA) Director Brian L. Love. “It is crucial that we protect those who took an oath to serve our nation. MVAA is dedicated to connecting Michigan veterans to the federal, state and local benefits and resources they earned.”

Veterans are encouraged to visit the MVAA website or call their Michigan Veterans Resource Service Center at 800-MICH-VET (800-642-4838) to locate resources in their community, learn about federal and state benefits and learn how to connect to a veteran service officer.

Veterans who believe they have been a victim of the scam can file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Attorney General. To file a complaint, you may reach the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Team at:

Consumer Protection Team
P.O. Box 30213
Lansing, MI 48909
517-335-7599
Fax: 517-241-3771
Toll-free: 877-765-8388
Online complaint form

Winter is best time to check for hemlock woolly adelgid

Winter is best time to check for hemlock woolly adelgid

 
Michigan Invasive Species Program banner

News Release

Nov. 20, 2025
Contact Cheryl Nelson, 231-287-1714, or Joanne Foreman, 517-284-5814

Winter is the best time to check trees for hemlock woolly adelgid

Invasive pest now confirmed in 11 Michigan counties

The Michigan departments of Natural Resources and Agriculture and Rural Development encourage those who have eastern hemlock trees on their property to take time this winter to inspect the trees for signs of hemlock woolly adelgid – tiny, soft-bodied insects that consume the trees’ stored nutrients, slowly sucking the life from the trees.

Close up view of infected tree with hemlock woolly adelgidAnyone taking to the woods also can help by looking for signs of this invasive insect while hunting, hiking or enjoying other outdoor activities.

Winter is the best time to look for evidence of an infestation, according to Robert Miller, MDARD’s invasive species prevention and response specialist.

“Cooler temperatures trigger feeding activity,” Miller said. “As the hemlock woolly adelgid feeds, it secretes a white, waxy material that creates ovisacs. The presence of these small, round, white masses makes it possible to identify infested trees.”

These insects are considered invasive because they are not native to the state and can cause significant harm to Michigan’s estimated 170 million hemlock trees.

Infestations of hemlock woolly adelgid have been confirmed in Allegan, Antrim, Benzie, Leelanau, Manistee, Mason, Muskegon, Oceana, Ottawa, Van Buren and Washtenaw counties.

Winter surveys underway

Surveying for hemlock woolly adelgid in a snowy forestThroughout the winter, survey crews from the DNR and multiple cooperative invasive species management areas, or CISMAs, will look for signs of hemlock woolly adelgids. Crews will focus their efforts along the northern edge of the infestation, conducting surveys within a 5-mile border along the Lake Michigan shoreline.

Because hemlock trees can be protected from these insects with proper insecticide treatments, infested trees and any other hemlocks within the area will be mapped and tagged, then prioritized for summer treatment.

If designated survey areas include private lands, CISMAs first will seek landowner permission. CISMA survey efforts are supported by funds from the Michigan Invasive Species Grant Program and the U.S. Forest Service and are provided at no cost to these landowners.

Your help is needed

Though dozens of staff will assist in the surveys, they won’t be able to check every hemlock. If you have hemlocks on your property, whether it’s within or beyond the 5-mile shoreline border, take some time to look for signs of hemlock woolly adelgid.

Anyone spending time outdoors is encouraged to do the same. Remember to take precautions and wear hunter orange during hunting seasons.

In Michigan’s northern forests, hemlock trees are found in moist soils along streams and riverbanks and along coastal dunes. Hemlock also is popular as a landscape tree in parks and residential areas.

Identify hemlock trees

Healthy hemlock branchSince these adelgids feed and form ovisacs only on eastern hemlock trees in Michigan, it is important to distinguish hemlocks from other conifers like pines or spruces. Look for:

  • Cone- or egg-shaped trees up to 75 feet tall.
  • Drooping or feathery branches.
  • Flat needles growing individually from the sides of twigs.
  • Needles that are dark green on top with two parallel, white stripes underneath.
  • Papery cones about three-quarters of an inch long that hang downward from branches.

Look for signs

Late fall through early spring is the best time to check hemlock trees. Look on the undersides of branches for evidence of round, white ovisacs near the base of the needles.

Up close, ovisacs look like tiny cotton balls and may appear alone or in clusters. The short video “Hemlock woolly adelgid: invasive species in Michigan” provides helpful identification tips.

Report your findings

Report infested hemlock trees by using the Midwest Invasive Species Information Network, available online at MISIN.MSU.edu or as a downloadable smartphone app. The MISIN smartphone app will take a GPS location point if a report is made at the site; it also will allow you to upload photos with a report.

Reports also can be made by email to MDA-Info@Michigan.gov or by phone to MDARD’s Customer Service Center at 800-292-3939.

Identify the location of infested trees and, whenever possible, take one or two pictures of infested branches to help confirm identification. To avoid spreading the insect, do not collect sample branches or twigs.

Manage your trees

Technician injecting treatment into a hemlock tree trunkIf you find hemlock woolly adelgid on your property, it is important to know that certain insecticides are effective in treating the infestation if used correctly. You can plan now for spring or summer treatment.

Without treatment, infested trees will die within four to 10 years. A qualified arborist, such as one certified by the International Society of Arboriculture, can diagnose and assist with treating infested trees.

If you are able to handle treatment on your own, follow the guidance provided in the Michigan State University Extension bulletin “How to treat hemlock trees for hemlock woolly adelgid.”

Reporting infested trees, even if you will be managing them on your own, is important to help determine how far hemlock woolly adelgid has spread. This information also indicates where additional surveys may be needed.

Find more information

For more information on identification, reporting or treatment, visit the Michigan Invasive Species Program’s hemlock woolly adelgid page at Michigan.gov/HWA.


Michigan’s Invasive Species Program is cooperatively implemented by the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy; the Department of Natural Resources; and the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.


Note to editors: Accompanying photos are available below for download. Caption information follows.

  • Infested branch: Round, white hemlock woolly adelgid ovisacs are found on the undersides of branches near the base of the needles.
  • Tagging tree: A cooperative invasive species management area staff member tags an infested hemlock tree in a forest. Photo courtesy of West Michigan CISMA.
  • Hemlock branch: Hemlock trees have small, papery cones and short needles that are dark green on top.
  • Tree injection: A certified pesticide applicator prepares to inject an infested hemlock tree with pesticide. Photo courtesy of West Michigan CISMA.
DNR Logo 24 bit PNGDept of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy logoMDARD Logo
Public Comment on Expedited DTE Data Center Application

Public Comment on Expedited DTE Data Center Application

Michigan Department of Attorney General Press Release banner

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
November 14, 2025

Media Contact:
Danny Wimmer

AG Nessel Urges Public Comment to Public Service Commission on Expedited DTE Data Center Application

LANSING – Today, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel is urging Michigan residents to file public comments with the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC), calling for public hearings over DTE’s plans to service an anticipated 1.4-gigawatt data center in Saline. DTE Electric has filed an ex parte request for approval of two special contracts to provide electric service to the data center and specifically requests their application be approved with no formal hearings or any of the traditional oversight in place that secure the interests of ratepayers and the public. It is anticipated that DTE’s costs to build the infrastructure to support this data center will number in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

In response, the Department of Attorney General filed a notice of intervention to request public hearings so that residents and other consumer protection organizations can weigh in. Public comment in case U-21990 can be filed on the MPSC website, at least until its next meeting on December 5th. Unless the MPSC grants the Attorney General’s request for formal hearings, this may be the only avenue for public input on the massive, newly proposed projects that could shape Michigan’s energy landscape for decades.

“The Commission needs to hear from the people of Michigan that we don’t want corners cut and shortcuts taken when it comes to such a monumental moment as our state enters the data center era and economy,” said Nessel. “How we handle these first massive data centers could impact everything from the electric bill in your mailbox, to our clean energy generation future, and widespread water and land use throughout both peninsulas. Before long, corporate data centers may be the largest energy consumers in our state, and we must thoroughly, and publicly, review these first contracts with an eye on protecting Michigan ratepayers and our shared resources.”

A formal public hearing with discovery and filed testimony will allow parties, such as the Attorney General, the opportunity to verify protections and cost reductions to customers proposed by the utility corporation and provide the Commission with a full evidentiary record to decide whether the special contract is prudent and reasonable. An ex parte request requires no public hearing, and no party is allowed to conduct discovery and file testimony for the Commission to review before deciding whether to approve the special contract.

“The Public Service Commission is under extraordinary and unprecedented political and industry pressure to close their eyes, plug their nose, and fast-track these special contracts that have the potential to shape state energy policy for decades to come,” continued Nessel. “Just last week, a bipartisan group of state legislators with no ties to Saline penned open letters supporting this fast-track, no-review plan to advance DTE’s agenda. DTE, of course, stands to gain untold millions in profit selling energy to these industrial-scale plants and it remains no mystery why they want such an expedited, short-sighted review of their plans – which remain murky and fail to show how DTE intends to live up to their lofty promises.”

The Michigan Public Service Commission is comprised of three members, each appointed by Governor Gretchen Whitmer. The Commission has routinely approved massive 9-figure annual rate hikes for each of the state’s major utility companies, at their request, multiple times a year. Since taking office, Attorney General Nessel has helped save Michigan consumers more than $4 billion by intervening in utility cases before the MPSC. Public comment in case U-21990 can be filed on the MPSC website. The MPSC is next scheduled to hold a regular meeting on December 5th and may take up this application from DTE at that public meeting.

“Never before has the Public Service Commission been tasked with exercising their regulatory function under such immense pressure from so many powerful voices and it is my belief that the Commission must hear from the Michigan public that we won’t leave our energy policy and data center future to be privately negotiated only by the companies standing to profit most,” Nessel concluded. “Please—reach out to the Commission today and demand they conduct fair oversight and regulation over these new contracts, rather than rubber stamp DTE’s handcrafted proposals for how best to profit off our energy future.”

Recount and audit report confirms MI elections are secure

Recount and audit report confirms MI elections are secure

Secretary Benson banner
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Oct. 13, 2025Contact: Cheri Hardmon

HardmonC@Michigan.gov

2024 post-election recount and audit report confirms Michigan’s elections are secure and accurate

Bureau of Elections report releases methods and results of nearly 500 audits across the state

LANSING, Mich. – Today, the Michigan Bureau of Elections (BOE) released its report on the recounts, ballot audits, and post-election procedural audits conducted after the 2024 General Election. The report affirms Michigan’s election integrity and accuracy in the state’s third consecutive election with record-breaking voter turnout.

“Careful, detailed, and thorough post-election audits are critical to election security and accuracy,” Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said. “Hundreds of bipartisan state, county, and local election officials worked tirelessly to review the processes, procedures and results of Michigan’s historic 2024 election. I’m especially grateful for the professionalism of these election administrators, whose thorough preparation and attention to detail continue to ensure our elections are secure and the results are an accurate reflection of the will of the voters.”

BOE, along with county clerks and their staff, conducted three types of statewide reviews:

  • statistical statewide ballot audit of the 2024 General Election in 166 randomly selected city and township precincts. The passage of Proposal 2018-3 amended the Michigan Constitution, requiring BOE to conduct these audits after every statewide general election.
  • Post-election procedural audits at the precinct level, including a hand count of the presidential race in each of 378 randomly selected precincts. The passage of Proposal 2018-3 amended the Michigan Constitution, requiring BOE to conduct these audits after every statewide general election.

Recount results

The original winner of the 44th State Representative District was confirmed by the recount. The vote differential went from 61 votes to 79 votes (a typical change found during a recount).

Statewide ballot audit results

Michigan’s statewide ballot audit is a statistical risk-limiting audit, reviewing a sufficient number of ballots to discover any tabulation error that would have changed the outcome of the election. The risk limit for the audit was set at 10%, which is the industry standard. Computer software randomly selected 166 precincts with a total of 119,567 ballots to be hand counted in the audit.

The audit found a total difference of 33 votes between the machine and hand counts – just .03% of audited ballots. Slight discrepancies between machine counts and hand counts are normal and typically have an average difference of 1 vote per precinct.

Both major party presidential candidates gained votes during the hand count. Kamala Harris (D) gained 11 votes (+.022%) and Donald Trump (R) gained 10 votes (+.014%).

Presidential Candidate

Nominating Party 

Machine Count

Hand Count

Difference 

Kamala Harris

Democratic

49,000

49,011

+11  (+.022%)

Donald Trump

Republican

67,443

67,453

+10  (+.014%)

Chase Oliver

Libertarian

576

577

+1  (+.17%)

Randall Terry

U.S. Taxpayers

115

116

+1  (+.87%)

Jill Stein

Green

763

757

-6  (-.78%)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Natural Law

593

592

-1  (-.17%)

Joseph Kishore

Independent

48

47

-1  (-2.1%)

Cornel West

Independent

107

105

-2  (-1.9%)

Precinct procedural audit results

Procedural audits in 378 randomly selected precincts checked over 70 key points in the election process. The audits help ensure that election officials and election inspectors followed the required procedures before, during, and after Election Day. Procedural audits covered each voting method including early in-person voting, voting by mail, and Election Day voting.

Overall, the procedural audits met the standard of good general compliance with election requirements and verified the reported election outcomes were correct. BOE will strengthen future election trainings to help clerks, election workers, and election inspectors avoid common minor errors and compliance issues found in the audit.

All audit results found Michigan’s election system was effective, secure, and accurately tabulated the results of the 2024 General Election. The audits also show that clerks performed their duties well and voting machines accurately counted over 5.7 million ballots cast by Michiganders.

For more information on Michigan’s election administration, processes, and security, visit Michigan.gov/SOS/Elections.

Read the full report: 2024 November General Election: Recounts, ballot audits, and post-election procedural audits

and accurate

Bureau of Elections report releases methods and results of nearly 500 audits across the state

LANSING, Mich. – Today, the Michigan Bureau of Elections (BOE) released its report on the recounts, ballot audits, and post-election procedural audits conducted after the 2024 General Election. The report affirms Michigan’s election integrity and accuracy in the state’s third consecutive election with record-breaking voter turnout.

“Careful, detailed, and thorough post-election audits are critical to election security and accuracy,” Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said. “Hundreds of bipartisan state, county, and local election officials worked tirelessly to review the processes, procedures and results of Michigan’s historic 2024 election. I’m especially grateful for the professionalism of these election administrators, whose thorough preparation and attention to detail continue to ensure our elections are secure and the results are an accurate reflection of the will of the voters.”

BOE, along with county clerks and their staff, conducted three types of statewide reviews:

  • statistical statewide ballot audit of the 2024 General Election in 166 randomly selected city and township precincts. The passage of Proposal 2018-3 amended the Michigan Constitution, requiring BOE to conduct these audits after every statewide general election.
  • Post-election procedural audits at the precinct level, including a hand count of the presidential race in each of 378 randomly selected precincts. The passage of Proposal 2018-3 amended the Michigan Constitution, requiring BOE to conduct these audits after every statewide general election.

Recount results

The original winner of the 44th State Representative District was confirmed by the recount. The vote differential went from 61 votes to 79 votes (a typical change found during a recount).

Statewide ballot audit results

Michigan’s statewide ballot audit is a statistical risk-limiting audit, reviewing a sufficient number of ballots to discover any tabulation error that would have changed the outcome of the election. The risk limit for the audit was set at 10%, which is the industry standard. Computer software randomly selected 166 precincts with a total of 119,567 ballots to be hand counted in the audit.

The audit found a total difference of 33 votes between the machine and hand counts – just .03% of audited ballots. Slight discrepancies between machine counts and hand counts are normal and typically have an average difference of 1 vote per precinct.

Both major party presidential candidates gained votes during the hand count. Kamala Harris (D) gained 11 votes (+.022%) and Donald Trump (R) gained 10 votes (+.014%).

Presidential Candidate

Nominating Party 

Machine Count

Hand Count

Difference 

Kamala Harris

Democratic

49,000

49,011

+11  (+.022%)

Donald Trump

Republican

67,443

67,453

+10  (+.014%)

Chase Oliver

Libertarian

576

577

+1  (+.17%)

Randall Terry

U.S. Taxpayers

115

116

+1  (+.87%)

Jill Stein

Green

763

757

-6  (-.78%)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Natural Law

593

592

-1  (-.17%)

Joseph Kishore

Independent

48

47

-1  (-2.1%)

Cornel West

Independent

107

105

-2  (-1.9%)

Precinct procedural audit results

Procedural audits in 378 randomly selected precincts checked over 70 key points in the election process. The audits help ensure that election officials and election inspectors followed the required procedures before, during, and after Election Day. Procedural audits covered each voting method including early in-person voting, voting by mail, and Election Day voting.

Overall, the procedural audits met the standard of good general compliance with election requirements and verified the reported election outcomes were correct. BOE will strengthen future election trainings to help clerks, election workers, and election inspectors avoid common minor errors and compliance issues found in the audit.

All audit results found Michigan’s election system was effective, secure, and accurately tabulated the results of the 2024 General Election. The audits also show that clerks performed their duties well and voting machines accurately counted over 5.7 million ballots cast by Michiganders.

For more information on Michigan’s election administration, processes, and security, visit Michigan.gov/SOS/Elections.

Read the full report: 2024 November General Election: Recounts, ballot audits, and post-election procedural audits

Final OAA Boys Soccer Rankings

Final OAA Boys Soccer Rankings

Final OAA Boys Soccer Rankings.

Written Monday October 6th at 11:59 PM

Here are the final Boys Soccer rankings for the season by Anthony Taormina.

1. Clarkston- Wolves won the Red, will be battle tested going into districts.

2. Troy- Colts look strong going into a very tough district.

3. Seaholm- Despite not being the top seed, the Maples are the most dangerous and they host.

4. Troy Athens- Red Hawks should have no problem in their Macomb County District that they host.

5. Bloomfield Hills- Blackhawks won the White, big matchup with Seaholm looming.

6. Royal Oak- First round matchup with Berkley has the potential to be a classic.

7. Lake Orion- Possible rematches with Blue and Gold rivals could happen.

8. Berkley- First round matchup with Royal Oak has the potential to be a classic.

9. Oxford- Looking to avenge their league loss to their arch rival in districts.

10. Groves- Back to back matchups with the arch rival in store.

11. Stoney Creek- Cougars look to avenge their loss to Adams earlier in the season.

12. Rochester- Falcons host a rivalry district that features Rochesters, Romeos, and Uticas alike.

13. Adams- Highlanders able to gain a tie in their final Red game. Districts different animal.

14. West Bloomfield- Lakers staying consistent in the White.

15. North Farmington- Leaving the OAA winning the Blue.

16. Farmington- Leaving the OAA last in the White.

17. Pontiac- Phoenix and Waterford Mott has a potential to be a great OAA rivalry.

18. Ferndale- Eagles finished in the middle of the pack in the Blue.

19. Avondale- Yellow Jackets have a tough rematch in districts with St. Mary’s.

20. Oak Park- Knights have a very brutal district matchup with Divine Child.

21. Southfield Arts and Tech- Warriors have a tough matchup with Troy looming in districts.

22. Harper Woods- Pioneers finish the season not making districts.