EGLE awards $9 million in PFAS response grants

EGLE awards $9 million in PFAS response grants

 
EGLE Main GovD banner
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Jan. 15, 2026
EGLE Media Office, EGLE-Assist@Michigan.gov, 517-284-9278

EGLE awards $9 million in PFAS response grants to 19 Michigan airports

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy today announced $9 million in grants to 19 municipal airports across the state to address PFAS contamination related to the use of PFAS-containing firefighting foam.

The grant funding will be used for a wide range of activities including PFAS testing and monitoring, potential source control and cleanup strategies for groundwater and stormwater, and cleaning of firefighting equipment and replacement firefighter turn-out gear.

The following airports have been awarded funding:

  • Battle Creek Executive Airport – $300,000
  • Bishop International Airport – $300,000
  • Capital Region International Airport – $300,000
  • Cherry Capital Airport (Northwest Regional Airport Authority) – $1,000,000
  • Chippewa County International Airport / Chippewa County Economic Development Corporation – $475,000
  • Delta County Airport – $476,697
  • Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport – $370,000
  • Ford Dickinson County Airport – $462,600
  • Former Marquette County Airport – $1,000,000
  • Gerald R Ford International Airport – $150,000
  • Gogebic-Iron County Airport – $361,400
  • Houghton County Memorial Airport – $1,000,000
  • Kalamazoo / Battle Creek International Airport – $710,681
  • Manistee County Blacker – $150,000
  • Marquette Sawyer Regional Airport – $150,000
  • MBS International Airport – $340,202
  • Oakland County International Airport – $264,479
  • Pellston Regional Airport – $1,000,000
  • Willow Run Airport – $250,000

A total of 21 applications requesting $14.8 million for the $9 million in allocated grant funding were received in response to the request for proposals from the Michigan PFAS Response Team (MPART).

Commonly known as PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are a group of potentially harmful man-made chemicals used in thousands of applications globally, including firefighting foam, food packaging, and many other consumer and industrial applications. They do not break down easily in the environment and are known to accumulate in the tissues of living organisms.

MPART is a team of seven state agencies established under an Executive Directive in 2017 to ensure coordination in implementing a response to PFAS contamination.  MPART became an enduring body under an Executive Order in 2019.  The goal of MPART is to protect public health by identifying sources of PFAS, addressing PFAS contamination at the sources, and working with local health departments to protect people in areas where groundwater is impacted by PFAS.

To learn more about PFAS and what the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART) is doing to address PFAS, go to www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse.

EGLE awards $9 million in PFAS response grants

EGLE announces Eight grants to protect or improve water quality

EGLE Main GovD banner

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Nov. 20, 2025
Jeff Johnston, EGLE Public Information Officer, JohnstonJ14@Michigan.gov, 517-231-9304
Robert Sweet, EGLE Project Administrator, SweetR@Michigan.gov , 517-512-9765

EGLE announces eight grants to protect or improve water quality

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) announced today about $2.9 million in Nonpoint Source (NPS) Program grants. These funds will support eight projects that will prevent, reduce, or eliminate polluted runoff and other nonpoint sources of pollution – caused when rain, snowmelt, or wind carry pollutants from land into lakes, streams, or wetlands.

The purpose of these grants is to carry out locally developed watershed management priorities that EGLE has approved to help restore impaired waters and protect high-quality waters by reducing NPS sediments, nutrients, bacteria, and other contaminants. These Nonpoint Pollution Control grants are funded through the Renew Michigan Fund and Section 319 of the Federal Clean Water Act. The projects recommended for funding will:

  • Address high levels of bacteria from human sources in the Thornapple River Watershed with outreach to homeowners, technical assistance, and funding for the repair and replacement of failing on-site septic systems.
  • Replace an undersized railroad-stream crossing in the Grand Traverse Bay Watershed to restore proper stream dimensions and sediment transport mechanisms to improve stream health and natural stream function.
  • Implement livestock best management practices in the Ottawa-Stony North and Munuscong River watersheds to address sources of sediment, nutrient, and E. coli impairments. Practices will include improvements to on-site manure management, restricting livestock access to surface water, and adding livestock stream crossings.
  • Develop an Inland Waterway stewardship guide to educate residents and recreational users across six major waterbodies including Crooked, Pickerel, Burt, and Mullet lakes as well as Indian and Cheboygan rivers on best management practices for reducing nutrient runoff, managing invasive species, and protecting shorelines. The project will leverage resources from statewide initiatives to drive action and increase public awareness and stewardship.
  • Protect approximately 300 acres in the Grand River Watershed and 552 acres in the Manistee River Watershed with water quality-based permanent conservation easements. Combined, these easements will prevent 33.6 tons of sediment, 542 pounds of nitrogen, and 112 pounds of phosphorus from entering Michigan waterways.

The following Michigan based organizations have been awarded funding:

  • Legacy Land Conservancy, Ann Arbor: $377,038
  • Washtenaw County Soil Conservation District, Ann Arbor: $383,484
  • Southwest Michigan Land Conservancy, Galesburg: $239,216
  • Barry Conservation District, Hastings: $339,462
  • Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council, Petoskey: $45,356
  • Chippewa Luce Mackinac Conservation District, Sault Ste. Marie: $500,000
  • Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy, Traverse City: $415,673
  • The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay, Traverse City: $614,993

A total of 17 applications requesting about $6.4 million were received in response to the request for proposals (RFP).

The grants are issued by EGLE’s NPS Program, which helps local stakeholders reduce pollution and excess runoff by supporting efforts to develop and launch watershed management plans.

The NPS Program typically issues an RFP each year for this funding source, with the next available opportunity to be released in January 2026. The RFP will be posted at Michigan.gov/NPS.

To stay up to date on EGLE news, follow Michigan.gov/MIEnvironment.

Choose winter pruning to help prevent oak wilt

Choose winter pruning to help prevent oak wilt

 
Michigan Invasive Species Program banner

News Release

Nov. 6, 2025
Contact: Cheryl Nelson, 231-287-1714 or Joanne Foreman, 517-284-5814

Choose winter pruning to help prevent oak wilt

Trees across Michigan are just wrapping up their display of fall color, with the reds, oranges and yellows of oak trees often taking center stage. That annual autumn color fest may be at risk, though, because oak trees across areas of the Lower Peninsula, as well as in Delta, Dickinson, Iron, Marquette and Menominee counties in the Upper Peninsula, are dying from oak wilt.

One of the best ways to help prevent oak wilt from infecting trees on your property is to avoid wounding them during the high-risk infection period, April 15 to July 15. Winter is a safe time to prune oak trees.

What is oak wilt?

Oak wilt infection seen in a cluster of four oak leaves that are brown on the outer edges but still green in the center.Caused by the fungus Bretziella fagacearum, oak wilt is fatal to oak trees, especially those in the red oak family, which includes black oak, northern red oak and northern pin oak – all identifiable by their pointed leaf tips.

Once a tree is infected, the fungus may fruit, creating distinct, gray to black fungal pads under the tree’s bark. Fungal spores can be picked up by sap-feeding nitidulid beetles attracted by the pads’ yeasty odor. Sap beetles spread oak wilt when they visit pruned or damaged oaks to feed on their exposed sap.

Oak wilt often is first identified when green leaves turn yellow or brown on the edges and begin to drop during the summer.
Infected oaks can spread the disease to other oaks through underground root connections or grafts, creating an expanding circle of dead trees.

Avoid the high-risk period

A gray and black oak wilt fungal pad found underneath the bark of an infected oak tree.Research demonstrates April 15 through July 15 is the high-risk period for oak wilt infection in Michigan because nitidulid beetles are very active and lots of fresh oak wilt spore mats are available. During this time, pruning or damaging oak trees should be avoided to prevent infections.

Winter is the ideal time to prune trees because nitidulid beetles and other pests that cause harmful tree diseases are less active in cold temperatures.

Landscaping and construction projects that can damage oaks also should be avoided during the high-risk period. When possible, choosing to postpone land clearing or use of heavy equipment around oak trees until the winter helps avoid a potential low risk of infection that can persist into late summer.

Can other trees get oak wilt?

White oaks, those with rounded leaves, are susceptible to oak wilt but may survive for several years or succumb more slowly before dying.

Researchers from Michigan State University detected the oak wilt fungus in an orchard of dying colossal chestnut trees in 2022, suggesting that some chestnut trees, part of the same family as oaks (Fagaceae), also can be infected.

Where is oak wilt in Michigan?

The DNR maintains an interactive online map for viewing verified, reported and treated locations of oak wilt across the state. The tool also can be used to report suspected oak wilt infections.

What can be done?

  • If oak trees need pruning, trimming or removal, plan these activities for winter months when possible.
  • If construction or removal of other trees may damage nearby oaks, perform these activities outside of the high-risk period, April 15 to July 15.
  • If oaks are damaged during the high-risk period, immediately cover wounds with tree wound paint or a latex-based paint.
  • Don’t move firewood, especially if it comes from oak wilt-killed trees, as it can harbor and spread the fungus.

To learn more about oak wilt, visit Michigan.gov/ForestHealth or MichiganOakWilt.org.

Michigan’s Invasive Species Program is cooperatively implemented by the Michigan departments of Agriculture and Rural Development; Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy; and Natural Resources.


Note to editors: Accompanying photos are available below for download. Caption information follows.

  • Oak wilt fungus: A gray and black oak wilt fungal pad found under the bark of an infected oak tree.
  • Oak wilt leaves: Oak leaves that turn yellow or brown on the edges during the summer may be a sign of oak wilt infection. Photo courtesy of D. W. French, University of Minnesota, Bugwood.org.

 

DNR Logo 24 bit PNGDept of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy logoMDARD Logo
New grants push number of clean-powered buses toward 900

New grants push number of clean-powered buses toward 900

EGLE Main GovD banner
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 
Oct. 13, 2025
Jeff Johnston, EGLE Public Information Officer, JohnstonJ14@Michigan.gov, 517-231-9304
Bob Wheaton, Michigan Department of Education Director of Public and Governmental Affairs, WheatonB1@Michigan.gov, 517-241-4395

New grants push Michigan’s number of clean-powered school buses toward 900

State and federal funds support transition to benefit air quality, student health, school budgets

LANSING, Michigan – The number of clean-powered school buses in Michigan keeps rising.

A new round of investment totaling $35.9 million from the Michigan Department of Education’s (MDE) $125 million Clean Bus Energy Grant (CBEG) program will help 23 schools and districts add 87 electric buses and 10 propane buses to fleets across the state. Recipients are listed below.

“Children and others in their communities benefit from cleaner air,” said Interim State Superintendent Dr. Sue C. Carnell. “We are happy to work with our partners at the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) to make our state greener. The Clean Bus Energy Grant program helps us move toward Goal 3 in Michigan’s Top 10 Strategic Education Plan, to improve the health, safety, and wellness of all learners.”

The new grants are the latest step in a clean-power transition for Michigan school transportation. Milestones along the way include:

  • In 2019 and 2020, EGLE awarded about $13 million in grants through its now-closed Fuel Transformation Program toward the purchase of 317 electric, clean diesel, and propane school buses and support infrastructure for more than 25 districts across the state.
  • In November 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) invested $54 million from its Clean School Bus Rebates program toward 138 new electric school buses and infrastructure for 25 Michigan school districts, from Southeast Michigan to the Upper Peninsula. The EPA’s Clean School Bus Program (CSBP) of grants and rebates provides $5 billion nationwide over fiscal years 2022-26.
  • In January 2024, three districts each received $5.9 million in CSBP funding to buy 15 clean-powered school buses apiece. Reports at the time said five additional Michigan districts were expected to receive a total of 21 new clean buses through multistate CSBP grants.
  • In May 2024, the CSBP rebate competition announced $23.98 million to help 27 Michigan schools and districts buy 97 buses powered by electricity and three powered by propane.
  • Also in 2024, MDE announced its first and second rounds of CBEG program funding: nearly $30 million in June to help 29 school districts and intermediate school districts buy a total of 114 buses powered by electricity, propane, or natural gas; and $15.2 million in October to help 21 districts buy 40 electric buses and 17 propane buses.

Together, grants and rebates so far account for nearly 900 buses – some yet to be purchased or enter service. The funds generally cover a significant portion of the costs for vehicles and infrastructure, with the balance paid from local sources.

EGLE has consistently supported clean power for Michigan’s nearly 17,000 buses transporting more than 800,000 students a year.

“The commitment by state and federal governments to provide schools with more environmentally friendly buses is good for our children, good for our schools, and good for our communities,” EGLE Director Phil Roos said. “Under Governor Whitmer’s leadership, we are investing in clean-powered school buses, improving air quality, and freeing up schools to invest in the classroom, and advancing the goals of the MI Healthy Climate Plan. These efforts are accelerating Michigan’s transition to a prosperous, healthy, equitable, clean energy future.”

Cleaner school buses offer many benefits, according to the EPA. With no or low emissions compared to diesel engines, they result in cleaner air on buses, in bus loading areas, and in the communities where they operate. Diesel exhaust can lower air quality and impact the environment and human health, especially for children who have a faster breathing rate than adults and whose lungs are not yet fully developed.

The new grants are Round 3 of the CBEG program, which to date has awarded more than $81 million to Michigan schools for buses and associated infrastructure.

Applications for a final CBEG round of up to approximately $44 million are due Dec. 18, 2025.

As part of the transition to clean buses, school districts across Michigan and nationwide are sharing solutions and working through challenges together. Groups such as the Michigan electric school bus coalition It’s Electric! advocate for school districts and support regular meetings with school transportation staff.

“We have enjoyed supporting school districts as they receive funds to transition their fleets from older, dirtier diesel buses to cleaner, quieter, newer models. This is a win for schools, kids, drivers, mechanics, and the surrounding community,” said Kindra Weid, It’s Electric! coalition coordinator. “We know change comes with challenges, but these buses are worth the effort, and school districts across Michigan are experiencing lower maintenance costs, quieter rides, and improved air quality as a result of their efforts pioneering new technology.”

Katrina Morris is executive director of the advocacy group Michigan Association of Pupil Transportation.

“Safety on the school bus is my top priority,” Morris said. “I want all kids to have a safe ride to and from school, so cleaner air for the kids, drivers, and the greater community is a victory. We are grateful for MDE and EGLE for supporting this transition to cleaner school buses.”

Here are the schools and districts awarded grant funding for the new CBEG round. Some awards include funding for charging infrastructure and related costs:

  • Anchor Bay School District: $984,738 for three electric buses.
  • Ann Arbor Public Schools: $4.09 million for 10 electric buses.
  • Athens Area Schools: $2.05 million for five electric buses.
  • Buchanan Community Schools: $161,530 for four propane buses.
  • Chippewa Valley Schools: $3.48 million for 10 electric buses.
  • Dearborn Academy: $334,001 for electric charging infrastructure.
  • Ferndale Public Schools: $1.078 million for three electric buses.
  • Godfrey-Lee Public Schools: $60,343 for one propane bus.
  • Gwinn Area Community Schools: $52,816 for one propane bus.
  • Lansing Public Schools: $4.31 million for 10 electric buses.
  • New Haven Community Schools: $78,927 for two propane buses.
  • North Branch Area Schools: $1.28 million for four electric buses.
  • Pellston Public Schools: $1.71 million for five electric buses.
  • Riverview Community School District: $57,294 for one propane bus.
  • Southfield Public Schools: $3.72 million for 10 electric buses.
  • Standish-Sterling Community Schools: $57,339 for one propane bus.
  • Stockbridge Community Schools: $3.49 million for six electric buses.
  • Traverse City Area Public Schools: $600,000 for two electric buses.
  • Troy School District: $961,330 for two electric buses.
  • Union City Community Schools: $2.18 million for six electric buses.
  • Van Buren Public Schools: $4.08 million for eight electric buses.
  • West Bloomfield School District: $308,741 for one electric buses.
  • Westwood Heights Schools: $778,669 for two electric buses.
EGLE awards $9 million in PFAS response grants

Muskegon Lake removed from list of most polluted sites

 
EGLE Main GovD banner
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 
Oct. 1, 2025
Jeff Johnston, EGLE Public Information Officer, JohnstonJ14@Michigan.gov, 517-231-9304
David Shark, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Press Officer, Shark.David@EPA.gov, 312-353-1056

Muskegon Lake removed from list of Great Lakes’ most polluted sites

‘A significant milestone’: Restored and revitalized ‘Area of Concern’ is fourth delisted in Michigan

MUSKEGON, Michigan – After decades of coordinated cleanup and community engagement, Muskegon Lake is no longer on a list of the Great Lakes’ most polluted places.

Officials from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) joined federal and local leaders and community members today at Heritage Landing park in Muskegon for a celebration of the lake’s removal, or delisting, from the U.S.-Canadian roster of Areas of Concern (AOC) around the Great Lakes.

“Completing this long journey of recovery, restoration, and renewal is a tremendous community achievement that EGLE has been proud to assist,” said EGLE Director Phil Roos. “Along with many partners, we celebrate today’s success and look forward to supporting tomorrow’s stewardship and growth.”

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 5 Administrator and Great Lakes National Program Manager Anne Vogel called it “a significant milestone in our ongoing work to restore and protect the Great Lakes. This accomplishment showcases the commitment and collaborative spirit of our partners in restoring not just the lake, but also the habitats and recreational opportunities that had been lost for so long.”

AOCs are designated areas in the Great Lakes Basin marked by high levels of historical legacy pollution requiring cleanup. The Great Lakes AOC Program was established in 1987 under the U.S.-Canada Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement to tackle the worst pollution hot spots.

Muskegon Lake was named an AOC even earlier, in 1985, following more than a century of contamination from industrial and municipal waste.

The Muskegon Lake Watershed Partnership (MLWP) formed in 1991. Six years later, sediment remediation projects for AOCs received $9.4 million from the Clean Michigan Initiative. Over the next 28 years, additional funding would come from the Great Lakes Legacy Act, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI), the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, and more.

All told, remediation and restoration took more than $84 million, including $67 million in federal funds, largely through the GLRI, and $17 million in state, local, and private contributions.

“For decades, our community has worked with partners in the nonprofit sector and every level of government to heal the wounds left by industrial pollution and to restore our treasured Muskegon Lake,” said Muskegon Mayor Ken Johnson. “Today’s delisting is not only an environmental victory but a testament to what’s possible when people come together with a shared vision for a healthier, more sustainable future.”

“We are thrilled to share that Muskegon Lake has officially been delisted as a U.S. EPA-designated Area of Concern – a milestone that marks the successful restoration of our watershed,” said MLWP Chair Dennis Kirksey. “We are already witnessing the benefits of this restoration – not only in the health of our environment, but in the vitality of our local economy. These improvements will continue to shape our community for generations to come.”

“I’m honored to have been part of the monumental transformation of Muskegon Lake. This achievement marks not only the end of an era but the beginning of a new chapter, one that will shape our community for generations to come,” said West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Corporation Executive Director Erin Kuhn.

“Muskegon Lake’s delisting as an Area of Concern is great news for all Michiganders and residents of the area,” said state Sen. Jon Bumstead. “I would like to thank EGLE and all of those who have worked to improve the water quality of Muskegon Lake and look forward to continued efforts to make further progress.”

“Muskegon is a city first and foremost set on Muskegon Lake; the lake has always been the lifeblood of the community, from the days of lumber to the days of industry to the tourism of today,” said Michigan Rep. Will Snyder. “This momentous day is the culmination of decades of hard work by hundreds of concerned active citizens partnering with government at every level to do big things. It’s exciting that we have restored Muskegon Lake to this degree. I look forward to the next decades of restoration.”

EGLE joined efforts with the EPA, local governments and tribes, and partners including Grand Valley State University (GVSU), the Muskegon Conservation District, the West Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission, and other federal agencies like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Federal, state, and local project partners remediated more than 190,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment and restored approximately 134 acres of habitat and over 6,000 feet of shoreline including nearly 100 acres of open water and emergent wetlands, as well as habitat for fish and native plants. Partners also removed more than 110,000 tons of logging-era sawmill debris from the lake, restoring habitat for bottom-dwelling invertebrates, fish, and wildlife.

By 2024, each of Muskegon Lake’s beneficial use impairments, or BUIs, under the AOC program was formally removed. Signoff by the U.S. State Department on Sept. 26 made the delisting official.

The investments are already paying dividends. According to a GVSU study, the remediation and restoration of Muskegon Lake is projected to increase local home values by nearly $8 million and boost the local recreation economy by $28 million annually. Muskegon already has seen a 19% increase in marina customers and a 45% increase in hotel room tax collected by the county. Overall, the projections anticipate a nearly six to one ratio of return on investment. More information is available at the EPA’s Muskegon Lake Area of Concern website.

Muskegon Lake covers 4,149 acres and flows into Lake Michigan from the west coast of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula.

It is the eighth U.S. AOC to be delisted and the fourth in Michigan, after Deer Lake in the Upper Peninsula and White Lake along Lake Michigan were delisted in 2014 and the Lower Menominee River, shared with Wisconsin, was delisted in 2020.

Ten AOCs remain in Michigan, all in various states of restoration: Torch Lake, Manistique River, and St. Marys River in the Upper Peninsula; Kalamazoo River in West Michigan; Saginaw River and Bay in the Thumb area; and St. Clair River, Clinton River, Rouge River, Detroit River, and River Raisin in the Detroit metropolitan area.

Invasive stiltgrass cropping up around southern Michigan

Invasive stiltgrass cropping up around southern Michigan

 
Michigan Invasive Species Program banner

News Release

Sept. 22, 2025
Contact: Drew Rayner, 517-231-8763 or Joanne Foreman 517-284-5814

Invasive stiltgrass cropping up around southern Michigan

Look for and report this fast-spreading invasive grass

Stiltgrass, a highly invasive annual grass that spreads quickly in disturbed areas, recently was detected in Augusta Creek, Barry and Petersburg state game areas.

The detections were the result of surveys conducted by the Michigan Invasive Species Program’s new public lands response team. Two foresters and two biologists were hired by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources through a 2024 State General Fund increase for the program to focus on early detection and rapid response for watch list species on the state’s 4.6 million acres of public land.

Biologists Petar Simic and Natalie Bekins have spent the summer seeking out and treating infestations of watch list invasive species on state lands in the southern Lower Peninsula.

Invasive species on Michigan’s watch list pose an immediate or potential threat to Michigan’s economy, environment or human health. These species either have never been confirmed in the wild in Michigan or have a limited known distribution.

A patch of invasive stiltgrass grows in the right-of-way near the edge of a paved road.In early August, Simic located the stiltgrass infestation at Petersburg State Game Area in Monroe County by following up on an online report submitted by a park user, who had begun removing the grass. The response team manually removed and disposed of all visible stiltgrass and will continue to monitor the site and remove new growth.

Bekins detected stiltgrass at the Barry State Game Area in Barry County while conducting an oak wilt survey in late August. Just a few weeks later, she encountered the invasive grass at Augusta Creek State Game Area in Kalamazoo County. Chemical treatment and manual removal were used at both sites. The response team will work with game area staff to continue monitoring and expand survey efforts along roads and rights-of-way in both areas.

Other Michigan infestations

Invasive stiltgrass is widespread in the southeastern U.S., including expanding areas in Indiana and Ohio. It was first detected in Michigan in 2017, when an infestation was confirmed on private lands in Washtenaw County.

Additional surveying has shown that this original infestation covers a large area of both public and private land along the Huron River northwest of Ann Arbor. A coalition including Ann Arbor and Washtenaw County parks and recreation departments and Wild Ones, a native plant collaborative, is managing infestations on public lands and training landowners in techniques for private land management. The Jackson, Lenawee and Washtenaw Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area continues to scout for new infestations in the area.

Smaller infestations in Berrien, Cass and Kent counties are being managed by local CISMAs.

Why be concerned?

Invasive stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) – also known as Nepalese browntop or Japanese stiltgrass – is highly adaptable, thriving in various soil, moisture and light conditions. It takes hold in areas of disturbed soil along forest edges, roadways, recreational trails, floodplains and stream corridors.

Each plant can produce up to 1,000 seeds, which can be spread by vehicles, foot traffic, water and wildlife. Because deer don’t feed on stiltgrass, it often takes over in areas where deer browse on native plants and leave open patches of soil.

You can help

Landowners, land managers and anyone spending time outdoors should look out for stiltgrass and report the location and photos of any suspected plants to the Midwest Invasive Species Information Network at MISIN.MSU.edu.

Identify stiltgrass

Invasive stiltgrass is identifiable by its long, narrow, pointed green leaves and silver stripe along the mid-rib.Stiltgrass looks like some native grasses, so it may not appear out of the ordinary to the general observer. Here is what to look for:

  • A thin, bamboo-like grass with jointed stems and well-spaced leaves.
  • Smooth green leaves 2 to 3 inches long and one-half inch wide, tapering to points at both ends, often with an off-center silver stripe or mid-rib.
  • 1- to 3-foot-high beds of grass, with some stems running across the ground and others shooting upright.
  • Roots, both at the base and stem joints, that are weakly attached to the soil and easy to pull up.
  • One to three slender, green flower spikes at the stem tips, appearing in August or September.

Be aware of look-alikes

A few common plants in Michigan easily may be mistaken for stiltgrass.

  • Smartweeds (Polygonum spp.), with tiny, white to pink flowers on a short spike and a tell-tale dark blotch near the center of each leaf.
  • Whitegrass (Leersia virginica), which is well-rooted in the soil and has longer, thinner leaves than stiltgrass, with no mid-rib stripe.
  • Northern shorthusk (Brachyelytrum aristosum), with fine hairs on the top, bottom and edges of its leaves and stems, and leaf veins in a pattern resembling an irregular brick wall.

Prevent the spread

When enjoying the outdoors, stay on trails and, whenever possible, park in paved or cleared areas. If you have been hiking, biking or four-wheeling, always take time to clean your shoes, gear and vehicles before going to a new location.

More information on invasive species identification and prevention is available at Michigan.gov/Invasives.

Images of smartweed, whitegrass and northern shorthusk illustrating their differences from invasive stiltgrass.Stiltgrass look-alikes include smartweed, whitegrass and Northern shorthusk.


Michigan’s Invasive Species Program is cooperatively implemented by the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy; the Department of Natural Resources; and the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.


Note to editors: Accompanying photos are available below for download. Caption information follows.

  • Stiltgrass BSGA: A patch of invasive stiltgrass detected in Barry State Game Area in a road right-of-way. DNR photo.
  • Stiltgrass_close-up: Stiltgrass leaves come to a point at both ends and often have a silvery stripe or mid-rib near the middle. Photo courtesy Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org.
  • Northern_shorthusk: A close-up of a northern shorthusk leaf reveals its unusual, brick-like leaf vein pattern. Photo courtesy Fontenelle Nature Association.
  • White_grass: Whitegrass looks similar to stiltgrass but has longer, thinner leaves and no mid-rib stripe. Photo courtesy Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org.
  • Pennsylvania_smartweed: Smartweeds have jointed stems and pointed leaves like stiltgrass, but they have white or pink flowers and leaves usually have a dark blotch across the center. Photo courtesy Michigan State University.
DNR Logo 24 bit PNGDept of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy logoMDARD Logo